Feb 3, 2017 - I managed to get Office 2013 almost to work with Crossover, but not with Wine 2.0. Latest Wine is supposed to support Office 2013, but I find no tutorials how to actually achieve that. So if the statement about support is true, how do I accomplish installing MS Office 2013 to Ubuntu with Wine 2.0? Office 2013 in Linux Mint 16. And forced you to have a Microsoft Account to install/use. My main qualm with Office 2013 is that it requires a Microsoft account. Which means in Linux, installing Windows in a VM and installing Office 2013 there. Mint 18.1 Mate; MS Win 8.1. Microsoft Office 2013.

We have a number of clients that use Linux desktops (mostly Ubuntu) and would like a better solution to connect to the exchange server than using a limited feature set of a web browser. They also use Libre Office (Open Office fork) and have some compatibility issues when opening documents from other internal/external MS Office users. I'm not sure if this is the right forum to make such a request, but, we would like to see a 'Microsoft Office for Linux' developed and made available to various mainstream distributions (Ubuntu, Red Hat). I would not expect this to be a free product or an open source product, but a commercially produced version compatible with the Linux platform. Essentially the same as what has been created in the Mac world 'Microsoft Office for Mac'. I would like to get some community feedback on this idea so please post your responses.

Hi, you can only install MS office using 'Wine' Emulator for Linux, but from this you can expect a lot of problems. MS just don't suppose to run on Linux. I have successfully connected Evolution mail to exchange, it works natively although it is not office but this could work better The main problem using Wine is that you have to deal with problems and fixing them require you to know Linux (Ubuntu distribution/Debian) on very high level Regards George www.supportweblog.com. I use Linux (Debian KDE), and I am unhappy with LibreOffice. Editing copy (usually MSWord created) in LibreOffice is a tightrope walk.

One slip and the formatting is ruined. I need office software for work, I am not a programmer or artist, and it really is a delight to use Microsoft Word. It's as efficient as any simple text editor!

In Linux, I often use the text editor instead of Libre Writer for making notes, so that I have a clean document in the end. Libre Writer just doesn't cut it. However, I don't think we will see a 'Microsoft Office for Linux' any time soon. There would be no reason to buy Windows if Office were made available for Linux. For everyday desktop use, Linux alternatives are as good as Windows offerings--except for office software.

I use Linux (Debian KDE), and I am unhappy with LibreOffice. Editing copy (usually MSWord created) in LibreOffice is a tightrope walk.

One slip and the formatting is ruined. I need office software for work, I am not a programmer or artist, and it really is a delight to use Microsoft Word. Open Source Automation Tools For Siebel Partner. It's as efficient as any simple text editor! Buku Panduan Pramuka Penegak Pdf. In Linux, I often use the text editor instead of Libre Writer for making notes, so that I have a clean document in the end.

Libre Writer just doesn't cut it. However, I don't think we will see a 'Microsoft Office for Linux' any time soon. There would be no reason to buy Windows if Office were made available for Linux. For everyday desktop use, Linux alternatives are as good as Windows offerings--except for office software.

LibreOffice is good for basic Office document compatibility (which probably suits most users, as will accessing exchange via a browser) but I Latihan Tes Toeic Dan Pembahasannya. 'm sure over time, the compatibility with more advanced features and formatting will improve. I disagree with the statement that 'there would be no reason to buy Windows.'

Case in point. It has now had Office for Mac for a number of years and still is only a small percentage of the total O/S market. Company policy will dictate what is used.

I'm not saying any O/S is any better or worse than any other O/S. I'm simply saying that not all companies settle on Windows. There will always be people that prefer one O/S over another or a business decision that has determined which O/S a company will use. From a financial perspective it makes sense for Microsoft to be able to profit from at least an 'Office for [x]' sale per machine where they would other-wise not make any profit at all from these companies. We can see from just the few posts that there are others that have also seen the need for this product for both themselves, their clients and the institutions they are involved with. In terms of the business case for the product and the programming issues, that is for Microsoft to evaluate and solve.